Categorized | National, Opinion, Politics

Rigged Presidential ‘Debates’ Amidst The Supine Media

 

Pathetic mainstream press fails to ask the real questions

 

By Ralph Nader
Nader.org

 

The three upcoming so-called presidential debates (actually parallel interviews) between Obama and Romney show the pathetic mainstream campaign press
for what it is – a mass of dittoheads desperately awaiting
gaffes or
some visual irregularity by any of the candidates.

The press certainly does not demand elementary material from the candidates such as the secret debate contract negotiated by the Obama and Romney campaigns that controls the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), the campaigns’ corporate offspring.

A similar secret contract between George W. Bush and John Kerry in 2004, obtained by George Farah, executive director of Open Debates (www.opendebates.org) showed just how the two Parties rig the debate process. Both Parties agreed that they would: (1) not request any additional debates, (2) not appear at any other debate or adversarial forum with any other presidential or vice presidential candidate, and (3) not accept any television or radio air time offers that involve a debate format. Were this deal to be between two corporations, they could be prosecuted for criminal violation of the antitrust laws.

 This year voters are not allowed to know about the current backroom fix between Obama and Romney.

Farah revealed more. The Bush/Kerry closeout of the voters and the media extended to their agreeing not to ask each other direct questions but only rhetorical questions, and to clear any questions from the audience by their chosen moderator prior to the debates. Of course third party candidates are excluded. In 2000 and 2004, national polls showed majorities wanting me in the debates – the only way non-billionaires could reach tens of millions of voters – but the captive CPD and their compliant director, Janet Brown, created other exclusionary barriers.

Nothing seems to motivate the mainstream campaign press into challenging the two Party duopoly, its definition of important questions, or the rancid corporate sponsorship of the debates down to the hospitality parties the corporatists hold at the debate locations in Colorado, New York and Florida this October. The reporters must like the free wine and food.

Nor did the supine press inform the voters of recent written requests by numerous organizations in the Pittsburgh, District of Columbia and Portland, Oregon regions inviting the presidential candidates to debate in these areas (http://nader.org/2012/09/18/ralph-nader-dc-organizations-call-for-presidential-debate/). Heaven forbid that the people strive to shape the presidential debate process and weaken the duopoly’s grip. Imagine a democratic process.

Substantively, the supine press applies its own rules.

Rule One is to avoid pressing questions that extend the public’s agenda beyond what the two major candidates are wrangling over. 

So if they don’t debate pulling back from unauthorized wars, invasions, incursions or other important foreign policy moves they are not asked.

Rule Two is to ignore what major civic groups or groups with credible track records propose for the candidates to address.

So Obama and Romney are not pressed by the press to expressly respond to many important issues including: what they would do on law enforcement against corporate crime, fraud and abuse, whether they favor a $10 minimum wage that catches up to 1968, inflation adjusted, for thirty million workers, or on their positions on either a Wall Street speculation tax that can raise big money or even a carbon tax.

Union organizing rights, workers’ health and safety, and a variety of important consumer protections are scarcely on the press table even when their own colleagues often report on these timely subjects.

When a matter is super-timely and they can interview the nation’s foremost expert on the politics of presidential debates – George Farah, author of No Debate – the major media is not interested. They have rejected his op-eds. Apart from local radio shows, he cannot get on national public radio, public TV or the commercial networks. It is not for lack of space and time being devoted to the Presidential campaigns.

I know Farah. He worked for me over a decade ago, right out of Princeton before going to Harvard Law School. He is an interviewers’ dream –speaks crisply, cogently and convincingly.

Maybe reporters should be given “curiosity training sessions” about what the public needs and wants to know but that the candidates are not interested in discussing.

Maybe columnists should work with the people on the ground instead of just working off clips and dealing with political flaks who restrict access to the candidates. Some columnists could benefit from a sabbatical for self-renewal.

Maybe editors and producers should expand beyond the usual “talking heads” and give the many important outside voices and movements some deserved coverage.

Our country needs a better performance by the major media that is stuck in routines, ruts and stagnant self-censorship from the national to the local levels. This is especially true of the concentrated television industry that uses our public airwaves, free of charge.

* * * * * * * * * *

The Humboldt Sentinel greatly appreciates Mr. Nader allowing us to share his column with our readers.

His biography is extensive.  Mr. Nader is a political activist, author, lecturer, and attorney.  Areas of particular concern to him include consumer protection, humanitarianism, environmentalism, and democratic government.

Ralph Nader has been called one of America’s most effective social critics.  His documented criticism of government and industry has had widespread effect on public awareness and bureaucratic power galvanizing a population of consumer advocates, citizen activists, and public interest lawyers who in turn have established their own organizations throughout the country.

Since 1966, Nader has been responsible for: at least eight major federal consumer protection laws such as the motor vehicle safety laws, Safe Drinking Water Act;  the launching of federal regulatory agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Environment Protection Agency (EPA), and Consumer Product Safety Administration; the recall of millions of defective motor vehicles; access to government through the Freedom of Information Act of 1974; and for many lives saved.

In his career as consumer advocate he founded many organizations including the Center for Study of Responsive Law, the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), the Center for Auto Safety, Public Citizen, Clean Water Action Project, the Disability Rights Center, the Pension Rights Center, the Project for Corporate Responsibility and The Multinational Monitor (a monthly magazine).

Mr. Nader’s articles can be seen at his website Nader.Org.

6 Responses to “Rigged Presidential ‘Debates’ Amidst The Supine Media”

  1. The ultimate debate cop out to me was, the debate between Bush and Gore. The Bush folks threatened Gore with lawsuits about Gore making campaign calls from his office (which he had already paid fines for). In exchange for dropping these lawsuits, which Gore felt would personally cripple him financially, Gore agreed not to bring up Bush’s environmental record in Texas. Apparently, he agreed to keep off this subject not only in the debates, but also not to make any mention of this in the entire campaign. I felt at the time that it was a cowardly deal for Gore to make, and I’m sure this decision had a lot to do with his defeat. For me, the environmental issues were the main reason that Gore made a good candidate. All we heard from him was, you know how I stand on the environment.

  2. high class says:

    Interesting! I haven’t read anything like this before.
    Good to find a person with genuine thoughts on
    this. Seriously… thanks for starting this up. This is
    required on the web, someone with originality!

  3. home says:

    Thank you for the good writeup.

  4. When you move that intention forward each day you create momentum.
    In addition to, being thrifty does not guarantee that you will become rich.
    With all of the empty industrial buildings in major metropolitan areas (think cities like Detroit) there is ample chance to rehabilitate these
    existing structures to incorporate a biofuel station for use near a
    new power plant.

  5. Demi says:

    I like what you guys are usually up too. This type of clever work and exposure!

    Keep up the very good works guys I’ve included you guuys to my own blogroll.

  6. gia Ca Phe says:

    I blog quite often and I genuinely thank you for
    your information. Your article has truly peaked my interest.
    I will book mark your website and keep checking for new information about once per week.
    I opted in for your RSS feed as well.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

HumSentinel on Twitter

RSS Progressive Review

  • Jazz break
    Coleman Hawkins Quintet […]
  • Recovered history: The real Clinton story, 1981
    Stories the media forgot to tell you1981 Hillary Clinton writes Jim McDougal: "If Reagonomics works at all, Whitewater could become the Western Hemisphere's Mecca." Major drug trafficker Barry Seal, under pressure from the Louisiana cops, relocates his operations to Mena, Arkansas. Seal is importing as much as 1,000 pounds of cocaine a month f […]
  • Real economics: Jobs
    The decline in the official poverty rate last year from 15.0 percent to 14.5 percent is especially welcome because it follows a decade and a half of mostly rising or stagnant poverty rates. Before 2013, the official poverty rate fell only once since 2000. Still, at the current rate of progress — which was hampered in 2013 by slow job growth and austerity pol […]
  • What's happening
    Boston thinks about becoming a new Venice to deal with sea water rise […]
  • Postal Service spied on almost 50,000 packages last year
    Gawker - A New York Times report shows that the Postal Service monitored nearly 50,000 packages sent in the U.S. in 2013 through a program called "mail covers." The surveillance program, which allows law enforcement agencies to access mailing and return addresses—anything written on the outside of a package—before it is delivered, has been in place […]
  • Erik Prince blames leftists for the convictIon of his contractors
    Fortress America - Erik Prince, the diminutive Blackwater founder, knows why four of his ex-employees were just convicted of murdering Iraqi civilians with machine guns: the goddamn anti-war hippies.Prince—a " Christian crusader" who's taken to being a patriotic American in Abu Dhabi while dodging lawsuits—took time to answer some mild-mannere […]
  • Republicans don't create jobs
     According to Bureau of Labor Statistics data analyzed by California economist Steven Stoft, in the 75 years from Fiscal Year 1940 to Fiscal Year 2014, Democratic administrations have generated 74 Million jobs. Republican  administrations during that time have generated 35 million jobs. […]
  • Online travel booking sits rig prices by customer's history
    Travel Mole - Online [travel] booking sites, according to new research, says available prices can be dependent on past browser history and 'personalization.'A study by researchers at the Northeastern University said price discrimination, whereas price is customized to a specific user, and price steering, when the order of search results is customiz […]
  • Andrew Cuomo hates public education
    Valerie Strauss, Washington Post - New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is running for re-election, has angered teachers, parents and education activists by telling the New York Daily News editorial board that he views the K-12 public education system as a “monopoly” and that teachers are opposed to be evaluated.According to this story in the Daily News, Cuomo sa […]
  • Hardly any sneak and peak warrants have been for terrorism cases
    Global Reseaarch -  Section 213 was included in the Patriot Act over the protests of privacy advocates and granted law enforcement the power to conduct a search while delaying notice to the suspect of the search. Known as a “sneak and peek” warrant, law enforcement was adamant Section 213 was needed to protect against terrorism. But the latest government rep […]
  • Unverifiable touch screen voting machines causing problems again
    Brad Blog -  100% unverifiable touch-screen voting systems reportedly began flipping votes from Democratic to Republican in Texas, and from Republican to Democratic in Illinois, and then from "NO" to "YES" on an anti-choice measure in Tennessee. Now it's reportedly happening in Maryland. Again.  .... Whether these systems fail (as th […]
  • Entropy update: Last days of journalism
    The already dubious Daily Beast has outdone itself by introducing "sponsored content." The first one we caught was a story about car plants using solar panels sponsored by none other than Shell which included this message: "History has proven that visionary minds have the power to change the world. We believe that the power of our collective m […]
  • Word
    Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough. - Franklin D. Roosevelt […]
  • Pocket paradigms
    In the post modern society -- one that supposedly rises above the false teachings of ideology -- we find ourselves with little to steer us save the opinions of whatever non-ideologue happens to be in power. Thus we may really only have progressed from the ideology of the many to the ideology of the one or, some might say, from democracy to authoritarianism. […]
  • Recovered history: The real Clinton story
    Things the media forgets to tell you about the Clintons and the state that made them.1980Bill Clinton loses re-election as governor. He will win two years later. Larry Nichols will tell the George Putman Show in 1998 that he had met with Clinton and Jackson Stephen's brother Witt and that Witt had told Clinton that the Stephens were ready to back him fo […]