Categorized | National, Opinion, Politics

Rigged Presidential ‘Debates’ Amidst The Supine Media

 

Pathetic mainstream press fails to ask the real questions

 

By Ralph Nader
Nader.org

 

The three upcoming so-called presidential debates (actually parallel interviews) between Obama and Romney show the pathetic mainstream campaign press
for what it is – a mass of dittoheads desperately awaiting
gaffes or
some visual irregularity by any of the candidates.

The press certainly does not demand elementary material from the candidates such as the secret debate contract negotiated by the Obama and Romney campaigns that controls the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), the campaigns’ corporate offspring.

A similar secret contract between George W. Bush and John Kerry in 2004, obtained by George Farah, executive director of Open Debates (www.opendebates.org) showed just how the two Parties rig the debate process. Both Parties agreed that they would: (1) not request any additional debates, (2) not appear at any other debate or adversarial forum with any other presidential or vice presidential candidate, and (3) not accept any television or radio air time offers that involve a debate format. Were this deal to be between two corporations, they could be prosecuted for criminal violation of the antitrust laws.

 This year voters are not allowed to know about the current backroom fix between Obama and Romney.

Farah revealed more. The Bush/Kerry closeout of the voters and the media extended to their agreeing not to ask each other direct questions but only rhetorical questions, and to clear any questions from the audience by their chosen moderator prior to the debates. Of course third party candidates are excluded. In 2000 and 2004, national polls showed majorities wanting me in the debates – the only way non-billionaires could reach tens of millions of voters – but the captive CPD and their compliant director, Janet Brown, created other exclusionary barriers.

Nothing seems to motivate the mainstream campaign press into challenging the two Party duopoly, its definition of important questions, or the rancid corporate sponsorship of the debates down to the hospitality parties the corporatists hold at the debate locations in Colorado, New York and Florida this October. The reporters must like the free wine and food.

Nor did the supine press inform the voters of recent written requests by numerous organizations in the Pittsburgh, District of Columbia and Portland, Oregon regions inviting the presidential candidates to debate in these areas (http://nader.org/2012/09/18/ralph-nader-dc-organizations-call-for-presidential-debate/). Heaven forbid that the people strive to shape the presidential debate process and weaken the duopoly’s grip. Imagine a democratic process.

Substantively, the supine press applies its own rules.

Rule One is to avoid pressing questions that extend the public’s agenda beyond what the two major candidates are wrangling over. 

So if they don’t debate pulling back from unauthorized wars, invasions, incursions or other important foreign policy moves they are not asked.

Rule Two is to ignore what major civic groups or groups with credible track records propose for the candidates to address.

So Obama and Romney are not pressed by the press to expressly respond to many important issues including: what they would do on law enforcement against corporate crime, fraud and abuse, whether they favor a $10 minimum wage that catches up to 1968, inflation adjusted, for thirty million workers, or on their positions on either a Wall Street speculation tax that can raise big money or even a carbon tax.

Union organizing rights, workers’ health and safety, and a variety of important consumer protections are scarcely on the press table even when their own colleagues often report on these timely subjects.

When a matter is super-timely and they can interview the nation’s foremost expert on the politics of presidential debates – George Farah, author of No Debate – the major media is not interested. They have rejected his op-eds. Apart from local radio shows, he cannot get on national public radio, public TV or the commercial networks. It is not for lack of space and time being devoted to the Presidential campaigns.

I know Farah. He worked for me over a decade ago, right out of Princeton before going to Harvard Law School. He is an interviewers’ dream –speaks crisply, cogently and convincingly.

Maybe reporters should be given “curiosity training sessions” about what the public needs and wants to know but that the candidates are not interested in discussing.

Maybe columnists should work with the people on the ground instead of just working off clips and dealing with political flaks who restrict access to the candidates. Some columnists could benefit from a sabbatical for self-renewal.

Maybe editors and producers should expand beyond the usual “talking heads” and give the many important outside voices and movements some deserved coverage.

Our country needs a better performance by the major media that is stuck in routines, ruts and stagnant self-censorship from the national to the local levels. This is especially true of the concentrated television industry that uses our public airwaves, free of charge.

* * * * * * * * * *

The Humboldt Sentinel greatly appreciates Mr. Nader allowing us to share his column with our readers.

His biography is extensive.  Mr. Nader is a political activist, author, lecturer, and attorney.  Areas of particular concern to him include consumer protection, humanitarianism, environmentalism, and democratic government.

Ralph Nader has been called one of America’s most effective social critics.  His documented criticism of government and industry has had widespread effect on public awareness and bureaucratic power galvanizing a population of consumer advocates, citizen activists, and public interest lawyers who in turn have established their own organizations throughout the country.

Since 1966, Nader has been responsible for: at least eight major federal consumer protection laws such as the motor vehicle safety laws, Safe Drinking Water Act;  the launching of federal regulatory agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Environment Protection Agency (EPA), and Consumer Product Safety Administration; the recall of millions of defective motor vehicles; access to government through the Freedom of Information Act of 1974; and for many lives saved.

In his career as consumer advocate he founded many organizations including the Center for Study of Responsive Law, the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), the Center for Auto Safety, Public Citizen, Clean Water Action Project, the Disability Rights Center, the Pension Rights Center, the Project for Corporate Responsibility and The Multinational Monitor (a monthly magazine).

Mr. Nader’s articles can be seen at his website Nader.Org.

7 Responses to “Rigged Presidential ‘Debates’ Amidst The Supine Media”

  1. The ultimate debate cop out to me was, the debate between Bush and Gore. The Bush folks threatened Gore with lawsuits about Gore making campaign calls from his office (which he had already paid fines for). In exchange for dropping these lawsuits, which Gore felt would personally cripple him financially, Gore agreed not to bring up Bush’s environmental record in Texas. Apparently, he agreed to keep off this subject not only in the debates, but also not to make any mention of this in the entire campaign. I felt at the time that it was a cowardly deal for Gore to make, and I’m sure this decision had a lot to do with his defeat. For me, the environmental issues were the main reason that Gore made a good candidate. All we heard from him was, you know how I stand on the environment.

  2. high class says:

    Interesting! I haven’t read anything like this before.
    Good to find a person with genuine thoughts on
    this. Seriously… thanks for starting this up. This is
    required on the web, someone with originality!

  3. home says:

    Thank you for the good writeup.

  4. When you move that intention forward each day you create momentum.
    In addition to, being thrifty does not guarantee that you will become rich.
    With all of the empty industrial buildings in major metropolitan areas (think cities like Detroit) there is ample chance to rehabilitate these
    existing structures to incorporate a biofuel station for use near a
    new power plant.

  5. Demi says:

    I like what you guys are usually up too. This type of clever work and exposure!

    Keep up the very good works guys I’ve included you guuys to my own blogroll.

  6. gia Ca Phe says:

    I blog quite often and I genuinely thank you for
    your information. Your article has truly peaked my interest.
    I will book mark your website and keep checking for new information about once per week.
    I opted in for your RSS feed as well.

  7. Rickey says:

    Hi to every body, it’s my first visit to this webpage. It carries remarkable and excellent material for visitors.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

HumSentinel on Twitter

RSS Progressive Review

  • Phiadelphia police stop tens of thousands illegally
    ACLU - The ACLU of Pennsylvania and the law firm of Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing & Feinberg filed a report as part of the monitoring process of the 2011 consent decree in Bailey v. Philadelphia, a lawsuit filed in 2010 alleging that Philadelphia Police Department officers had a pattern and practice of stopping and frisking pedestrians without reasonable sus […]
  • The real economy
    Michael Snyder, Activist PostAccording to a survey that was just released, 24 percent of all Americans have more credit card debt than emergency savings.At this point, approximately 62 percent of all Americans are living paycheck to paycheck.Adults under the age of 35 in the United States currently have a savings rate of negative 2 percent.According to resea […]
  • Word: Jihadi John
     Djelloul Marbrook -  This guy is getting more attention in the press than the underlying causes of the Middle East turmoil. The press has kept a constant focus on him, for example, while failing to give us a clue as to what happened to the thousands of troops Jordan moved to its Iraqi border and the implications of that move. There is a reason and it, as us […]
  • Revolutionary visionary
    In short my dear Friend you and I have been indefatigable Labourers through our whole Lives for a Cause which will be thrown away in the next generation, upon the Vanity and Foppery of Persons of whom we do not now know the Names perhaps. — The War that is now breaking out will render our Country, whether she is forced into it, or not, rich, great and powerf […]
  • Furthermore. . .
    Adjunct professors fighting back […]
  • Race to the Bottom: Federal officials
    Michael RogersJohn BrennanArne DuncanJeh JohnsonAntonio ScaliaJames Clapper […]
  • How to take on standardized testing
    World Prosperity - Ways for teachers to fight the standardized testing movement: • You can prepare your students for the tests, but then get back to concentrating on real learning.  Keep it clear in your mind that these are two different objectives.  Whenever possible, help others to see the difference (in letters to parents, for example). • Don't devot […]
  • Word
    Schoolmasters and parents exist to be grown out of - John Wolfenden […]
  • How Portugal slashed its drug addiction rate
    Portside - Nearly 15 years ago, Portugal had one of the worst drug problems in Europe, with one percent of the population addicted to heroin. They had tried a drug war, and the problem just kept getting worse.So they decided to do something radically different. They resolved to decriminalize all drugs, and transfer all the money they used to spend on arresti […]
  • Scott Walker puts labor unions in same class as ISIS
    Scott Walker - I want a commander in chief who will do everything in their power to ensure that the threat from radical Islamic terrorists does not wash up on American soil. If I can take on 100,000 protesters, I can do the same across the world." […]
  • Cable speeding up programs to get more ads in
    Tech Dirt - The latest example of cable industry tone deafness? With cable and broadcast ratings continuing to fall, more and more people have been complaining that the industry increasingly likes to speed up programs notably so more ads can be stuffed into every hour. By speeding up Seinfeld by about 7.5%, for example, the industry can manage to deliver an […]
  • Furthermore. . .
    The feud between Rahm Emmanuel and Howard Dean Chicago police black site updateThe Federal Communications Commission voted Thursday to overturn laws in Tennessee and North Carolina that restrict the ability of local government to provide Internet service to their own residents. […]
  • FCC votes for open Internet
    Salon - The FCC voted in favor of the Open Internet Order, new net neutrality rules that would prohibit paid Internet paid fast lanes, and reclassify broadband providers as telecommunication services under the Title II of the Telecommunications Act, among other regulations.The rules were passed by a 3-2 vote along party lines, with Commissioners Ajut Pai and […]
  • Missouri judge rules against state's participation in Common Core
    Valerie Strauss, Washington Post - The fighting over the Common Core initiative continues: A Missouri judge said the state’s membership in a federally funded testing consortium charged with creating an assessment aligned with the Common Core standards is illegal. And what’s more, he ruled that the state should stop paying fees to the group, the Smarter Balan […]
  • Wisconsin vs. Minnesota
     Khary […]