CISPA decried by civil libertarians and White House for lacking limits on info sharing
By Charles Douglas
Humboldt Sentinel
After beating back threats to online privacy late last year such as SOPA and PIPA, Internet activists were appalled by a sudden vote in the House of Representatives to adopt the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act.
Passed on a 248-168 vote, CISPA — which amends the National Security Act to subject the private communications of every American to sharing with the military and the National Security Agency — sailed through the House with the support of 42 Democrats, including Congressman Mike Thompson (Dem. – St. Helena), who also co-sponsored HR 3523. Their vote ignored the signatures of over 1 million Americans rapidly collected by the American Civil Liberties Union, Avaaz.org, Demand Progress, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Free Press.
“CISPA is a dangerous piece of legislation and it’s worrisome that the House has passed such an overreaching bill,” Free Press Action Fund policy director Matt Wood stated. “The bill still lacks effective oversight and accountability for companies and government agencies collecting massive amounts of our personal data.”
President Barack Obama has already threatened to veto the bill due to its treatment of domestic cybersecurity as an intelligence matter and its lack of safeguards on personally identifying information. CISPA now heads to the United States Senate, where its companion legislation, S.2105, is spearheaded by Senator Joseph Lieberman (Ind. – Connecticut) and Susan Collins (Rep. – Maine).
“It would curtail Internet openness and freedom by stripping away crucial privacy protections, and without providing any guarantee of protection for critical infrastructure,” Woods went on to state. “If the Senate chooses to move forward with cybersecurity legislation, we urge senators to make the changes necessary to protect civil liberties and Internet freedom.”
The Washington-based Constitution Project was more blunt with its criticisms, characterizing CISPA as enabling the use of information completely unrelated to security concerns. A constellation of business interests are backing the bill, including AT&T, Facebook, IBM, Intel, Oracle, Verizon and corporate lobby groups like the United States Chamber of Commerce and the National Defense Industrial Association — leading Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul to call CISPA “an alarming form of corporatism, as it further intertwines government with companies…”
“It permits them to hand over your private communications to government officials without a warrant, circumventing well-established federal laws like the Wiretap Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act,” Rep. Paul went on to say. “It also grants them broad immunity from lawsuits for doing so, leaving you without recourse for invasions of privacy. Simply put, CISPA encourages some of our most successful internet companies to act as government spies, sowing distrust of social media and chilling communication in one segment of the world economy where America still leads.”
The Electronic Frontier Foundation of San Francisco claimed CISPA would lead to the censorship of any speech presumed to degrade a network, not to mention provide private corporations and the feds with a powerful weapon to target whistleblowers.
“It is a long-held American value that the military doesn’t operate on U.S. soil against Americans, and allowing the NSA and [Department of Defense] to collect information on average Americans turns that value on its head,” ACLU legislative counsel Michelle Richardson stated. “All domestic programs must be run by civilian agencies. And finally, CISPA offers few limitations on what can be done with the information that the government ultimately collects.”
Thompson, the North Coast’s representative in the House for nearly 14 years, is running for Congress in the new 5th District, which stretches from southern Lake County to Vallejo and the northern tip of Contra Costa County. He has raised over $38,000 from proponents of CISPA in this election cycle, including $6,000 from Comcast. His office declined to comment on his support for CISPA, which he co-sponsored on Nov. 30 of last year.
The Senate version of CISPA is also co-sponsored by Senator Dianne Feinstein of California.


Recent Comments